banner



Home  ›  In Which Of The Following Are You Most Likely To Find Some Prey Animals That Are Brightly Colored?

In Which Of The Following Are You Most Likely To Find Some Prey Animals That Are Brightly Colored?

Written By Thursday, May 26, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Honest signalling of an animal's powerful defences

Aposematism is the ad by an animal to potential predators that it is neither worth attacking nor eating it.[1] This unprofitability may consist of whatsoever defences which make the casualty difficult to kill and swallow, such equally toxicity, venom, foul taste or smell, sharp spines, or ambitious nature. These advertizement signals may take the class of conspicuous coloration, sounds, odours,[two] or other perceivable characteristics. Aposematic signals are beneficial for both predator and casualty, since both avert potential harm.

The term was coined in 1877 by Edward Bagnall Poulton[3] [four] for Alfred Russel Wallace'southward concept of warning coloration.[5] Aposematism is exploited in Müllerian mimicry, where species with potent defences evolve to resemble 1 another. By mimicking similarly coloured species, the warning betoken to predators is shared, causing them to learn more quickly at less of a cost.

A 18-carat aposematic signal that a species actually possesses chemical or physical defences is non the merely style to deter predators. In Batesian mimicry, a mimicking species resembles an aposematic model closely enough to share the protection, while many species take bluffing deimatic displays which may startle a predator long enough to enable an otherwise undefended prey to escape. There is skillful evidence for aposematism in terrestrial animals; its beingness in marine animals is possible but disputed.

Etymology [edit]

The term aposematism was coined by the English zoologist Edward Bagnall Poulton in his 1890 book The Colours of Animals. He based the term on the Ancient Greek words ἀπό apo 'away' and σῆμα sēma 'sign', referring to signs that warn other animals away.[3] [4]

Defence machinery [edit]

The function of aposematism is to preclude attack, by warning potential predators that the prey beast has defences such equally being unpalatable or poisonous. The easily detected warning is a primary defence mechanism, and the non-visible defences are secondary.[six] Aposematic signals are primarily visual, using bright colours and high-contrast patterns such as stripes. Alarm signals are honest indications of noxious prey, because conspicuousness evolves in tandem with noxiousness.[7] Thus, the brighter and more conspicuous the organism, the more toxic it normally is.[7] [8] This is in contrast to deimatic displays, which attempt to startle a predator with a threatening appearance simply which are bluffing, unsupported past any strong defences.[9]

The about common and effective colours are red, yellow, black, and white.[x] These colours provide strong contrast with light-green foliage, resist changes in shadow and lighting, are highly chromatic, and provide distance dependent camouflage.[10] Some forms of warning coloration provide this distance dependent cover-up by having an effective design and colour combination that practise not allow for piece of cake detection by a predator from a altitude, simply are warning-like from a close proximity, allowing for an advantageous balance betwixt cover-up and aposematism.[11] Warning coloration evolves in response to background, light conditions, and predator vision.[12] Visible signals may be accompanied by odours, sounds or behaviour to provide a multi-modal signal which is more finer detected by predators.[13]

Hycleus lugens, an aposematically coloured beetle

Unpalatability, broadly understood, can exist created in a diverseness of means. Some insects such every bit the ladybird or tiger moth contain bitter-tasting chemicals,[14] while the skunk produces a baneful smell, and the poison glands of the poison dart frog, the sting of a velvet ant or neurotoxin in a blackness widow spider brand them dangerous or painful to attack. Tiger moths annunciate their unpalatability by either producing ultrasonic noises which warn bats to avert them,[14] or past warning postures which betrayal brightly coloured trunk parts (see Unkenreflex), or exposing eyespots. Velvet ants (actually parasitic wasps) such every bit Dasymutilla occidentalis both have bright colours and produce audible noises when grabbed (via stridulation), which serve to reinforce the alert.[xv] Amidst mammals, predators tin exist dissuaded when a smaller creature is aggressive and able to defend itself, as for example in love badgers.[sixteen]

Prevalence [edit]

In terrestrial ecosystems [edit]

Skunk, Mephitis mephitis, advertizement its powerful defences, scent glands near the tail, past raising its tail and displaying its warning coloration

Aposematism is widespread in insects, but less then in vertebrates, existence mostly confined to a smaller number of reptile, amphibian, and fish species, and some foul-smelling or aggressive mammals. Pitohuis, scarlet and black birds whose toxic feathers and skin plain comes from the poisonous beetles they ingest, could be included.[17] It has been proposed that aposematism played a role in human development, body scent carrying a warning to predators of large hominins able to defend themselves with weapons.[18]

Peradventure the most numerous aposematic vertebrates are the toxicant dart frogs (family unit: Dendrobatidae).[19] These neotropical anuran amphibians exhibit a broad spectrum of coloration and toxicity.[20] Some species in this poison frog family unit (particularly Dendrobates, Epipedobates, and Phyllobates) are conspicuously coloured and sequester i of the almost toxic alkaloids among all living species.[21] [22] Inside the aforementioned family, there are also cryptic frogs (such as Colostethus and Mannophryne) that lack these toxic alkaloids.[23] [24] Although these frogs display an extensive array of coloration and toxicity, at that place is very petty genetic departure between the species.[20] Evolution of their conspicuous coloration is correlated to traits such as chemical defense, dietary specialization, acoustic diversification, and increased body mass.[25] [22]

Some plants are thought to employ aposematism to warn herbivores of unpalatable chemicals or physical defences such as prickled leaves or thorns.[26] Many insects, such every bit cinnabar moth caterpillars, acquire toxic chemicals from their host plants.[27] Among mammals, skunks and zorillas advertise their foul-smelling chemical defences with sharply contrasting black-and-white patterns on their fur, while the similarly-patterned badger and honey badger annunciate their sharp claws, powerful jaws, and ambitious natures.[28] Some brightly coloured birds such equally passerines with contrasting patterns may likewise be aposematic, at least in females; but since male birds are often brightly coloured through sexual pick, and their coloration is not correlated with edibility, information technology is unclear whether aposematism is pregnant.[29]

The sound-producing rattle of rattlesnakes is an acoustic class of aposematism.[thirty] Audio production by the caterpillar of the Polyphemus moth, Antheraea polyphemus, may similarly exist audio-visual aposematism, connected to and preceded past chemical defences.[31] Similar acoustic defences exist in a range of Bombycoidea caterpillars.[32]

In marine ecosystems [edit]

The existence of aposematism in marine ecosystems is controversial.[35] Many marine organisms, specially those on coral reefs, are brightly coloured or patterned, including sponges, corals, molluscs and fish, with little or no connection to chemical or physical defenses. Caribbean reef sponges are brightly coloured, and many species are full of toxic chemicals, but at that place is no statistical human relationship between the 2 factors.[36]

Nudibranch molluscs are the most commonly cited examples of aposematism in marine ecosystems, but the evidence for this has been contested,[37] by and large considering (i) there are few examples of mimicry among species, (2) many species are nocturnal or ambiguous, and (3) bright colours at the red stop of the colour spectrum are chop-chop attenuated as a office of h2o depth. For instance, the Castilian Dancer nudibranch (genus Hexabranchus), amongst the largest of tropical marine slugs, potently chemically defended, and brilliantly red and white, is nocturnal and has no known mimics. Mimicry is to be expected as Batesian mimics with weak defences tin can gain a measure of protection from their resemblance to aposematic species.[38] Other studies take concluded that nudibranchs such every bit the slugs of the family Phyllidiidae from Indo-Pacific coral reefs are aposematically coloured.[39] Müllerian mimicry has been implicated in the coloration of some Mediterranean nudibranchs, all of which derive defensive chemicals from their sponge diet.[forty]

Iridescent blue rings on the mantles of the venomous octopus Hapalochlaena lunulata are considered by some to be aposematic.

The crown-of-thorns starfish, like other starfish such equally Metrodira subulata, has conspicuous coloration and conspicuous long, sharp spines, besides every bit cytolytic saponins, chemicals which could function as an effective defence; this evidence is argued to be sufficient for such species to be considered aposematic.[33] [34] It has been proposed that aposematism and mimicry is less axiomatic in marine invertebrates than terrestrial insects considering predation is a more than intense selective force for many insects, which disperse every bit adults rather than as larvae and have much shorter generation times.[35] Farther, at that place is evidence that fish predators such as blueheads may adapt to visual cues more than apace than do birds, making aposematism less effective.[41]

Blue-ringed octopuses are venomous. They spend much of their fourth dimension hiding in crevices whilst displaying effective camouflage patterns with their dermal chromatophore cells. All the same, if they are provoked, they apace change colour, becoming bright yellowish with each of the fifty-60 rings flashing bright iridescent blue within a 3rd of a 2nd.[42] It is often stated this is an aposematic alert display,[43] [44] [45] [46] but the hypothesis has rarely if e'er been tested.[47]

Behaviour [edit]

The mechanism of defence relies on the retentivity of the would-be predator; a bird that has once experienced a foul-tasting grasshopper will endeavour to avoid a repetition of the experience. As a outcome, aposematic species are oft gregarious. Before the memory of a bad experience attenuates, the predator may have the experience reinforced through repetition. Aposematic organisms frequently motion in a languid fashion, every bit they have fiddling demand for speed and agility. Instead, their morphology is frequently tough and resistant to injury, thereby assuasive them to escape once the predator is warned off. Aposematic species do not need to hide or stay still every bit cryptic organisms do, then aposematic individuals do good from more freedom in exposed areas and can spend more fourth dimension foraging, allowing them to observe more than and improve quality food.[48] They may likewise be able to make utilize of conspicuous mating displays, including vocal signals, which may and then develop through sexual choice.[49] [22]

Origins of the theory [edit]

Gregarious nymphs of an aposematic milkweed problems, Lygaeus kalmii

Wallace, 1867 [edit]

In a letter to Alfred Russel Wallace dated 23 February 1867, Charles Darwin wrote, "On Mon evening I called on Bates & put a difficulty before him, which he could non answer, & equally on some sometime similar occasion, his offset proposition was, 'you had ameliorate ask Wallace'. My difficulty is, why are caterpillars sometimes so beautifully & artistically coloured?"[fifty] Darwin was puzzled because his theory of sexual selection (where females cull their mates based on how attractive they are) could not apply to caterpillars since they are immature and hence not sexually agile.

Wallace replied the side by side solar day with the suggestion that since some caterpillars "...are protected by a disagreeable gustatory modality or olfactory property, it would be a positive advantage to them never to be mistaken for any of the palatable catterpillars [sic], because a slight wound such as would be caused by a peck of a bird's bill almost always I believe kills a growing catterpillar. Any gaudy & conspicuous color therefore, that would evidently distinguish them from the brown & dark-green eatable catterpillars, would enable birds to recognise them easily equally at a kind not fit for nutrient, & thus they would escape seizure which is as bad as beingness eaten."[51]

Since Darwin was enthusiastic about the thought, Wallace asked the Entomological Lodge of London to exam the hypothesis.[52] In response, the entomologist John Jenner Weir conducted experiments with caterpillars and birds in his aviary, and in 1869 he provided the first experimental show for alarm coloration in animals.[53] The evolution of aposematism surprised 19th-century naturalists because the probability of its establishment in a population was presumed to be low, since a conspicuous signal suggested a college hazard of predation.[54]

Poulton, 1890 [edit]

Wallace coined the term "warning colours" in an article nearly animal coloration in 1877.[5] In 1890 Edward Bagnall Poulton renamed the concept aposematism in his book The Colours of Animals.[iv] He described the derivation of the term as follows:

The second head (Sematic Colours) includes Warning Colours and Recognition Markings: the old warn an enemy off, and are therefore chosen Aposematic [Greek, apo, from, and sema, sign][55]

Evolution [edit]

Aposematism is paradoxical in evolutionary terms, every bit information technology makes individuals conspicuous to predators, so they may be killed and the trait eliminated before predators learn to avoid it.[56] If warning coloration puts the first few individuals at such a strong disadvantage, it would never last in the species long enough to go beneficial.[57]

Supported explanations [edit]

There is prove for explanations involving dietary conservatism, in which predators avert new prey because information technology is an unknown quantity;[58] this is a long-lasting event.[58] [59] [lx] Dietary conservatism has been demonstrated experimentally in some species of birds and fish.[61] [58] [sixty] [62]

Further, birds recall and avert objects that are both conspicuous and foul-tasting longer than objects that are equally foul-tasting only cryptically coloured.[63] This suggests that Wallace's original view, that alarm coloration helped to teach predators to avoid prey thus coloured, was correct.[64] All the same, some birds (inexperienced starlings and domestic chicks) also innately avoid conspicuously coloured objects, as demonstrated using mealworms painted yellowish and black to resemble wasps, with deadening green controls. This implies that warning coloration works at to the lowest degree in function by stimulating the development of predators to encode the meaning of the warning signal, rather than by requiring each new generation to acquire the signal's meaning.[64] All of these results contradict the idea that novel, brightly coloured individuals would exist more likely to be eaten or attacked by predators.[58] [65]

Alternative hypotheses [edit]

Other explanations are possible. Predators might innately fearfulness unfamiliar forms (neophobia)[66] long enough for them to go established, but this is likely to be merely temporary.[57] [66] [67]

Alternatively, casualty animals might exist sufficiently gregarious to form clusters tight plenty to enhance the warning signal. If the species was already unpalatable, predators might acquire to avert the cluster, protecting gregarious individuals with the new aposematic trait.[68] [69] Gregariousness would assistance predators to acquire to avoid unpalatable, gregarious prey.[70] Aposematism could likewise be favoured in dumbo populations fifty-fifty if these are not gregarious.[58] [66]

Some other possibility is that a gene for aposematism might be recessive and located on the X chromosome.[71] If so, predators would learn to associate the colour with unpalatability from males with the trait, while heterozygous females carry the trait until it becomes common and predators sympathise the signal.[71] Well-fed predators might also ignore aposematic morphs, preferring other prey species.[57] [72]

A farther explanation is that females might adopt brighter males, then sexual selection could issue in aposematic males having college reproductive success than non-aposematic males if they can survive long enough to mate. Sexual choice is stiff enough to permit seemingly maladaptive traits to persist despite other factors working against the trait.[19]

In one case aposematic individuals accomplish a sure threshold population, for whatever reason, the predator learning process would exist spread out over a larger number of individuals and therefore is less likely to wipe out the trait for warning coloration completely.[73] If the population of aposematic individuals all originated from the same few individuals, the predator learning procedure would result in a stronger warning signal for surviving kin, resulting in higher inclusive fitness for the dead or injured individuals through kin pick.[74]

A theory for the development of aposematism posits that it arises by reciprocal selection betwixt predators and prey, where distinctive features in prey, which could be visual or chemical, are selected by non-discriminating predators, and where, concurrently, avoidance of distinctive prey is selected by predators. Concurrent reciprocal selection (CRS) may entail learning by predators or it may give rise to unlearned avoidances by them. Aposematism arising past CRS operates without special conditions of the gregariousness or the relatedness of prey, and it is non contingent upon predator sampling of prey to learn that aposematic cues are associated with unpalatability or other unprofitable features.[75]

Mimicry [edit]

Aposematism is a sufficiently successful strategy to have had significant furnishings on the development of both aposematic and non-aposematic species.

Not-aposematic species have ofttimes evolved to mimic the conspicuous markings of their aposematic counterparts. For case, the hornet moth is a deceptive mimic of the yellowjacket wasp; it resembles the wasp, merely has no sting. A predator which avoids the wasp will to some caste besides avoid the moth. This is known as Batesian mimicry, after Henry Walter Bates, a British naturalist who studied Amazonian butterflies in the second half of the 19th century.[76] Batesian mimicry is frequency dependent: information technology is most effective when the ratio of mimic to model is low; otherwise, predators will come across the mimic as well oft.[77] [78]

A second form of mimicry occurs when two aposematic organisms share the aforementioned anti-predator accommodation and not-deceptively mimic each other, to the benefit of both species, since fewer individuals of either species need to be attacked for predators to learn to avoid both of them. This form of mimicry is known every bit Müllerian mimicry, later Fritz Müller, a German language naturalist who studied the phenomenon in the Amazon in the late 19th century.[79] [lxxx] Many species of bee and wasp that occur together are Müllerian mimics; their similar coloration teaches predators that a striped pattern is associated with being stung. Therefore, a predator which has had a negative experience with whatever such species will likely avoid whatever that resemble information technology in the future. Müllerian mimicry is found in vertebrates such as the mimic toxicant frog (Ranitomeya imitator) which has several morphs throughout its natural geographical range, each of which looks very similar to a different species of toxicant frog which lives in that surface area.[81]

  • A model (to be mimicked), the venomous and genuinely aposematic coral snake

Come across besides [edit]

  • Handicap principle

References [edit]

  1. ^ Santos, J. C.; Coloma, Luis A.; Cannatella, D. C. (2003). "Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (22): 12792–12797. doi:10.1073/pnas.2133521100. PMC240697. PMID 14555763.
  2. ^ Eisner, T.; Grant, R. P. (1981). "Toxicity, Odour Disfavor, and 'Olfactory Aposematism'". Scientific discipline. 213 (4506): 476. Bibcode:1981Sci...213..476E. doi:x.1126/science.7244647. PMID 7244647.
  3. ^ a b Poulton 1890, pp. Foldout "The Colours of Animals Classified Co-ordinate to Their Uses", afterwards page 339.
  4. ^ a b c Marek, Paul. "Aposematism". Apheloria. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved Nov 24, 2012.
  5. ^ a b Wallace, Alfred Russel (1877). "The Colours of Animals and Plants. I.—The Colours of Animals". Macmillan'southward Magazine. 36 (215): 384–408.
  6. ^ Ruxton, Sherratt & Speed 2004, pp. 82–103.
  7. ^ a b Maan, G. Eastward.; Cummings, G. E. (2012). "Poison frog colors are honest signals of toxicity, specially for bird predators". American Naturalist. 179 (1): E1–E14. doi:10.1086/663197. hdl:2152/31175. JSTOR 663197. PMID 22173468. S2CID 1963316.
  8. ^ Blount, Jonathan D.; Speed, Michael P.; Ruxton, Graeme D.; et al. (2009). "Alert displays may role as honest signals of toxicity". Proceedings of the Royal Guild B. 276 (1658): 871–877. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1407. PMC2664363. PMID 19019790.
  9. ^ Sendova-Franks, Ana; Scott, Michelle Pellissier (2015). "Featured Manufactures in This Month's Animal Behaviour". Creature Behaviour. 100: three–five. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.013. S2CID 53202282.
  10. ^ a b Stevens, Thousand.; Ruxton, G. D. (2012). "Linking the evolution and form of alarm coloration in nature". Proceedings of the Royal Lodge B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1728): 417–426. doi:x.1098/rspb.2011.1932. PMC3234570. PMID 22113031.
  11. ^ Tullberg, B. South., Merilaita S., & Wiklund, C. (2005). "Aposematism and Crypsis Combined as a Result of Distance Dependence: Functional Versatility of the Color Design in the Swallowtail Butterfly Larva". Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 272 (1570): 1315–1321. doi:ten.1098/rspb.2005.3079. PMC1560331. PMID 16006332. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  12. ^ Wang, I. J.; Shaffer, H. B. (2008). "Rapid color evolution in an aposematic species: A phylogenetic analysis of color variation in the strikingly polymorphic strawberry poisonous substance-dart frog". Evolution. 62 (11): 2742–2759. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00507.x. PMID 18764916.
  13. ^ MacAuslane, Heather J. (2008). "Aposematism". In Capinera (ed.). Encyclopedia Entomologica. Vol. 4. pp. 239–242.
  14. ^ a b Hristov, North. I.; Conner, West. Due east. (2005). "Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat–tiger moth arms race". Naturwissenschaften. 92 (4): 164–169. Bibcode:2005NW.....92..164H. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7. PMID 15772807. S2CID 18306198.
  15. ^ Schmidt, J. O.; Blum, M. S. (1977). "Adaptations and Responses of Dasymutilla occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) to Predators". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 21 (2): 99–111. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1977.tb02663.x. S2CID 83847876.
  16. ^ "Black, White and Stinky: Explaining Coloration in Skunks and Other Boldly Colored Animals". University of Massachusetts Amherst. 27 May 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2016.
  17. ^ Dumbacher, J. P.; Beehler, B. M.; Spande, T. F.; et al. (1992). "Homobatrachotoxin in the genus Pitohui: chemical defense force in birds?". Science. 258 (5083): 799–801. Bibcode:1992Sci...258..799D. doi:10.1126/science.1439786. PMID 1439786.
  18. ^ Weldon, Paul J. (xviii August 2018). "Are we chemically aposematic? Revisiting L. S. B. Leakey'south hypothesis on human trunk smell". Biological Journal of the Linnean Gild. 125 (2): 221–228. doi:10.1093/biolinnean/bly109.
  19. ^ a b Maan, M. E.; Cummings, Chiliad. Due east. (2009). "Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual pick on aposematic signals in a poison frog". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (45): 19072–19077. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10619072M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903327106. PMC2776464. PMID 19858491.
  20. ^ a b Summers, Kyle; Clough, Marking E. (2001-05-22). "The evolution of coloration and toxicity in the poisonous substance frog family unit (Dendrobatidae)". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (eleven): 6227–6232. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.6227S. doi:10.1073/pnas.101134898. PMC33450. PMID 11353830.
  21. ^ Santos, Juan C.; Tarvin, Rebecca D.; O'Connell, Lauren A. (2016). Schulte, Bruce A.; Goodwin, Thomas East.; Ferkin, Michael H. (eds.). "A Review of Chemical Defence force in Poison Frogs (Dendrobatidae): Ecology, Pharmacokinetics, and Autoresistance". Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Springer International Publishing. 13: 305–337. doi:x.1007/978-3-319-22026-0_21. ISBN9783319220260. S2CID 85845409.
  22. ^ a b c Santos, Juan C.; Baquero, Margarita; Barrio-Amorós, César; et al. (2014-12-07). "Aposematism increases audio-visual diversification and speciation in poison frogs". Proceedings of the Royal Lodge B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1796): 20141761. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1761. PMC4213648. PMID 25320164.
  23. ^ Guillory, Wilson X.; Muell, Morgan R.; Summers, Kyle; et al. (Baronial 2019). "Phylogenomic Reconstruction of the Neotropical Poison Frogs (Dendrobatidae) and Their Conservation". Multifariousness. eleven (8): 126. doi:10.3390/d11080126.
  24. ^ "Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and nutrition specialization in poisonous substance frogs (PDF Download Available)". ResearchGate . Retrieved 2017-11-11 .
  25. ^ Santos, Juan C.; Cannatella, David C. (2011-04-12). "Phenotypic integration emerges from aposematism and scale in toxicant frogs". Proceedings of the National University of Sciences. 108 (15): 6175–6180. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.6175S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010952108. PMC3076872. PMID 21444790.
  26. ^ Rubino, Darrin Fifty.; McCarthy, Brian C. "Presence of Aposematic (Warning) Coloration in Vascular Plants of Southeastern Ohio" Journal of the Torrey Botanical Order, Vol. 131, No. 3 (Jul-Sep 2004), pp. 252-256. https://world wide web.jstor.org/stable/4126955
  27. ^ Edmunds 1974, pp. 199–201.
  28. ^ Caro, Tim (2009). "Contrasting coloration in terrestrial mammals". Philosophical Transactions of the Regal Society B: Biological Sciences. 364 (1516): 537–548. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0221. PMC2674080. PMID 18990666.
  29. ^ Götmark, Frank (1994). "Are Bright Birds Distasteful? A Re-Analysis of H. B. Cott's Data on the Edibility of Birds". Periodical of Avian Biology. 25 (3): 184–197. doi:10.2307/3677074. JSTOR 3677074.
  30. ^ Meik, Jesse M.; Pires-daSilva, André (10 February 2009). "Evolutionary morphology of the rattlesnake style". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 9 (1): 35. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-nine-35. PMC2645363. PMID 19208237.
  31. ^ Brown, Sarah G.; Boettner, George H.; Yack, Jayne Due east. (xv March 2007). "Clicking caterpillars: acoustic aposematism in Antheraea polyphemus and other Bombycoidea". The Periodical of Experimental Biology. 210 (6): 993–1005. doi:10.1242/jeb.001990. PMID 17337712.
  32. ^ Bura, Veronica L.; Kawahara, Akito Y.; Yack, Jayne East. (11 August 2016). "A Comparative Analysis of Sonic Defences in Bombycoidea Caterpillars". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 31469. Bibcode:2016NatSR...631469B. doi:ten.1038/srep31469. PMC4980592. PMID 27510510.
  33. ^ a b Shedd, John G. (2006). "Crown of Thorns Ocean Star". Shedd Aquarium. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 21 June 2015.
  34. ^ a b Inbar, Moshe; Lev-Yadun, Simcha (2005). "Conspicuous and aposematic spines in the creature kingdom" (PDF). Naturwissenschaften. 92 (4): 170–172. Bibcode:2005NW.....92..170I. doi:x.1007/s00114-005-0608-ii. PMID 15761732. S2CID 8525349. defensive fauna spines are often conspicuous (shape and colour) and should be considered aposematic... Classic examples are the starfishes Acanthaster planci and Metrodira subulata, which accept reddish spines...
  35. ^ a b Pawlik, J. R. (2012). Fattorusso, Due east.; et al. (eds.). Antipredatory defensive roles of natural products from marine invertebrates. Handbook of Marine Natural Products. Springer. pp. 677–710.
  36. ^ Pawlik, J. R.; et al. (1995). "Defenses of Caribbean area sponges against predatory reef fish: I. Chemical deterrenc". Marine Ecology Progress Serial. 127: 183–194. Bibcode:1995MEPS..127..183P. doi:10.3354/meps127183.
  37. ^ Edmunds, Malcolm (1991). "Does alarm coloration occur in nudibranchs?". Malacologia. 32: 241–255.
  38. ^ Pawlik, J. R.; et al. (1988). "Defensive chemicals of the Spanish Dancer nudibranch, Hexabranchus sanguineus, and its egg ribbons: Macrolides derived from a sponge diet". Journal of Experimental Marine Biological science and Ecology. 119 (2): 99–109. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(88)90225-0.
  39. ^ Ritson-Williams, R.; Paul, V. J. (2007). "Marine benthic invertebrates use multimodal cues for defence force against reef fish". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 340: 29–39. doi:ten.3354/meps340029.
  40. ^ Haber, M.; et al. (2010). "Coloration and defense in the nudibranch gastropod Hypselodoris fontandraui". Biological Message. 218 (2): 181–188. doi:x.1086/BBLv218n2p181. PMID 20413794. S2CID 10948319.
  41. ^ Miller, A. M.; Pawlik, J. R. (2013). "Do coral reef fish acquire to avert unpalatable prey using visual cues?". Fauna Behaviour. 85 (2): 339–347. doi:x.1016/j.anbehav.2012.11.002. S2CID 43941481.
  42. ^ Mäthger, 50. Chiliad. (2012). Bell, G. R., Kuzirian, A. M., Allen, J. J. and Hanlon, R. T. "How does the bluish-ringed octopus (Hapalochlaena lunulata) flash its blue rings?". The Periodical of Experimental Biology. 215 (21): 3752–3757. doi:x.1242/jeb.076869. PMID 23053367.
  43. ^ Williams, B. L. (2011). Lovenburg, V., Huffard, C. L. and Caldwell, R. 50. "Chemical defense in pelagic octopus paralarvae: Tetrodotoxin alone does not protect individual paralarvae of the greater blue-ringed octopus (Hapalochlaena lunulata) from common reef predators". Chemoecology. 21 (3): 131–141. doi:10.1007/s00049-011-0075-5. S2CID 9953958.
  44. ^ Huffard, C. L., Saarman, N., Hamilton, H. and Simison, W. B. (2010). "The development of conspicuous facultative mimicry in octopuses: an example of secondary adaptation?". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 101 (1): 68–77. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01484.x. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  45. ^ Lambert, W. A. (2011). A Review of Blue-ringed Octopus Conservation (Masters thesis). Prescott College.
  46. ^ Hanlon, R. T.; Messenger, J. B. (1998). Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
  47. ^ Umbers, K. D. (2013). "On the perception, production and function of blue coloration in animals". Journal of Zoology. 289 (four): 229–242. doi:ten.1111/jzo.12001.
  48. ^ Speed, M. P.; Brockhurst, One thousand. A.; Ruxton, G. D. (2010). "The dual benefits of aposematism: predator abstention and enhanced resources collection". Evolution. 64 (6): 1622–1633. doi:ten.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00931.10. PMID 20050915. S2CID 21509940.
  49. ^ Rudh, A.; Rogell, B.; Håstad, O.; et al. (2011). "Rapid population divergence linked with co-variation betwixt coloration and sexual display in strawberry poison frogs". Evolution. 65 (5): 1271–1282. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01210.x. PMID 21166789. S2CID 10785432.
  50. ^ Darwin, Charles. "Letter from Charles Robert Darwin to Alfred Russel Wallace dated 23 Feb [1867]".
  51. ^ Wallace, Alfred Russel. "Letter of the alphabet from Alfred Russel Wallace to Charles Robert Darwin dated 24 February [1867]".
  52. ^ Anon (1867). "Discussion [Wallace's explanation of brilliant colors in caterpillar larvae, and others' comments thereon, presented at the ESL meeting of iv March 1867]". Journal of Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London: lxxx–lxxxi.
  53. ^ Slotten, Ross (2004). The Heretic in Darwin'due south Courtroom:The Life of Alfred Russel Wallace. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 253–524. ISBN978-0-231-13010-three.
  54. ^ Higashi, Masahiko; Yachi, Shigeo (August 1998). "The evolution of alert signals". Nature. 394 (6696): 882–884. Bibcode:1998Natur.394..882Y. doi:ten.1038/29751. S2CID 204999972.
  55. ^ Poulton 1890, pp. 337–338.
  56. ^ Briolat, Emmanuelle S.; Burdfield-Steel, Emily R.; Paul, Sarah C.; et al. (2019). "Diversity in warning coloration: selective paradox or the norm?". Biological Reviews. 94 (ii): 388–414. doi:10.1111/brv.12460. PMC6446817. PMID 30152037.
  57. ^ a b c Mappes, Johanna; Marples, Nicola; Endler, John A. (2005). "The complex business organisation of survival past aposematism". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. twenty (eleven): 598–603. doi:x.1016/j.tree.2005.07.011. PMID 16701442.
  58. ^ a b c d eastward Thomas, R. J.; Marples, N. M.; Cuthill, Innes C.; et al. (2003). "Dietary conservatism may facilitate the initial evolution of aposematism". Oikos. 101 (3): 548–566. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12061.x.
  59. ^ Marples, Nicola M.; Kelly, David J.; Thomas, Robert J. (2005). "Perspective: The development of warning coloration is not paradoxical". Development. 59 (5): 933–940. doi:ten.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01032.x. PMID 16136793.
  60. ^ a b Lindstrom, Leena; Altalo, Rauno V.; Lyytinen, Anne; et al. (2001). "Predator feel on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic casualty". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 268 (1465): 357–361. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1377. PMC1088614. PMID 11270431.
  61. ^ Richards, E. Loys; Thomas, Robert J.; Marples, Nicola M.; et al. (2011). "The expression of dietary conservatism in solitary and shoaling 3-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus". Behavioral Ecology. 22 (4): 738–744. doi:x.1093/beheco/arr047.
  62. ^ Richards, East. Loys; Alexander, Lucille 1000.; Snellgrove, Donna; et al. (February 2014). "Variation in the expression of dietary conservatism within and betwixt fish species". Animal Behaviour. 88: 49–56. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.009. S2CID 53174146.
  63. ^ Siddall, Emma C.; Marples, Nicola Yard. (2008-01-22). "Better to be bimodal: the interaction of color and odor on learning and retention". Behavioral Ecology. 19 (2): 425–432. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm155.
  64. ^ a b Roper, Tim J. (9 July 1987). "All things bright and poisonous". New Scientist. Reed Business Information. pp. fifty–52.
  65. ^ Marples, Nicola M.; Kelly, David J.; Thomas, Robert J. (May 2005). "Perspective: The Evolution of Warning Coloration is Not Paradoxical". Evolution. 59 (5): 933–940. doi:ten.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01032.x. PMID 16136793.
  66. ^ a b c Speed, Michael P. (2001). "Tin receiver psychology explicate the evolution of aposematism?". Animal Behaviour. 61 (1): 205–216. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1558. PMID 11170710. S2CID 13434024.
  67. ^ Exernova, Alice; Stys, Pavel; Fucikova, Eva; et al. (2007). "Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate?". Behavioral Ecology. eighteen (1): 148–156. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl061.
  68. ^ Gamberale, Gabriella; Tullberg, Birgitta Due south. (1998). "Aposematism and gregariousness: the combined effect of group size and coloration on signal repellence". Proceedings of the Imperial Society B: Biological Sciences. 265 (1399): 889–894. doi:x.1098/rspb.1998.0374. PMC1689056.
  69. ^ Mappes, Johanna; Alatalo, Rauno V. (1996). "Furnishings of novelty and gregariousness in survival of aposematic casualty". Behavioral Environmental. 8 (2): 174–177. doi:x.1093/beheco/viii.two.174.
  70. ^ Ruxton, Graeme D.; Sherratt, Thomas North. (2006). "Aggregation, defence force, and warning signals: the evolutionary relationship". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 273 (1600): 2417–2424. doi:x.1098/rspb.2006.3570. PMC1634906. PMID 16959629.
  71. ^ a b Brodie, Edmund D. III; Agrawal, Anell F. (2001). "Maternal furnishings and the development of aposematic signals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (14): 7884–7887. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.7884B. doi:10.1073/pnas.141075998. PMC35437. PMID 11416165.
  72. ^ Merilaita, Sami; Kaitala, Veijo (2002). "Customs structure and the evolution of aposematic coloration". Ecology Letters. 5 (4): 495–501. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00362.x. S2CID 7188102.
  73. ^ Lee, T. J.; Marples, N. Chiliad.; Speed, M. P. (2010). "Can dietary conservatism explain the primary evolution of aposematism?". Animal Behaviour. 79: 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.004. S2CID 54273453.
  74. ^ Servedio, M. R. (2000). "The furnishings of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration". Evolution. 54 (3): 751–763. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00077.x. PMID 10937250.
  75. ^ Weldon, P.J. (December 2013). "Chemical aposematism". Chemoecology. 23 (4): 201–202. doi:10.1007/s00049-013-0140-3. S2CID 27025142.
  76. ^ Bates, Henry Walter (1861). "Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae". Transactions of the Linnean Order. 23 (3): 495–566. doi:ten.1111/j.1096-3642.1860.tb00146.ten. ; Reprint: Bates, Henry Walter (1981). "Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae)". Biological Periodical of the Linnean Social club. sixteen (1): 41–54. doi:ten.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb01842.x.
  77. ^ Harper, Chiliad. R.; Pfennig, D. W (22 August 2007). "Mimicry on the edge: why do mimics vary in resemblance to their model in unlike parts of their geographical range?". Proceedings of the Purple Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1621): 1955–1961. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0558. PMC2275182. PMID 17567563.
  78. ^ Edmunds 1974, p. 112.
  79. ^ Müller, Fritz (1878). "Ueber die Vortheile der Mimicry bei Schmetterlingen" [On the advantages of mimicry in collywobbles]. Zoologischer Anzeiger (in German language). 1: 54–55.
  80. ^ Müller, Fritz (1879). Translated by R. Meldola. "Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies". Proclamations of the Entomological Society of London. 1879: 20–29.
  81. ^ Twomey, Evan; Brown, Jason (1986). "Ranitomeya imitator". Dendrobates.org . Retrieved 11 May 2015.

Sources [edit]

  • Edmunds, Malcolm (1974). Defence in Animals . Longman. ISBN978-0-582-44132-three.
  • Poulton, Edward Bagnall (1890). The Colours of Animals, their pregnant and use, especially considered in the case of insects. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trübner.
  • Ruxton, Graeme D.; Sherratt, T. Due north.; Speed, M. P. (2004). Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford University Printing. ISBN978-0-xix-852859-three.

External links [edit]

  • Media related to Alarm coloration at Wikimedia Commons

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism

Posted by: jacobsoulding.blogspot.com

0 Response to "In Which Of The Following Are You Most Likely To Find Some Prey Animals That Are Brightly Colored?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel