Are two Windows 10 updates a year doing more to hurt users than help them?

Windows as a Service allows Microsoft to update Windows 10 on a regular footing with patches, security updates, and indeed new features. These new features arrive in the grade of "major updates" that Microsoft has committed to releasing twice a year. While two major updates a year allows Microsoft to introduce and get new features out faster, it also causes a lot of headaches for the end-user.

Microsoft'due south latest feature update for Windows 10, known equally the Apr 2022 update, has proven exceptionally problematic for a lot of users. Users across the web have been struggling with bug effectually dedicated GPUs, Bluetooth connectivity, notifications that wrongly alert the user of depression storage, and a whole lot more. Of class, no update is perfect, but the April 2022 update seems much more than buggy than previous characteristic updates to Windows 10 have been.

I've never suffered from whatsoever major issues with previous features updates, only with the April update I've hit numerous problems that have fabricated using my PCs difficult or impossible. For example, my Surface Book two is suffering from constant lag when switching tabs or closing windows. It makes using the device almost impossible. I was originally also suffering from Bluetooth connection issues on my Surface Studio, but those problems have now been resolved.

it feels like Microsoft is struggling to ensure quality when edifice and testing new characteristic updates every vi months.

Could releasing just i major update a year improve the quality of Windows 10 feature updates? With the April update, it feels like Microsoft is struggling to ensure quality when edifice and testing new feature updates, as it only has a limited time to exercise so. With ane update a year, Microsoft would take double the time to build out and test a new feature update, which would help in ensuring a higher quality release when it comes to shipping.

Let'south be honest, almost users don't like updates. Users especially don't similar updates on Windows, which are rather intrusive and crave the user to restart way too often. Not simply that, but restarting to install an update takes time, which users don't want to have to sit through and deal with. That, bundled with the fact that characteristic updates are becoming known for causing more problems than solving them, ways users just don't desire to bargain with Windows as a Service.

One update or two?

Cutting back to one major update a yr would make updates feel a little more significant and less of a hassle, which is good for users. It's not similar Windows 10 users would be any less secure either, because with Patch Tuesday Microsoft keeps Windows 10 up to date anyhow. The just downside to cutting back to one release a year would exist that it means Microsoft and users have to await longer for a new characteristic to show up.

Moving to one major update a year would brand updates more pregnant and less of a hassle.

That becomes problematic if Microsoft is unable to ship a characteristic in fourth dimension for release. Correct at present, if a feature misses its borderline, it's only another six months earlier that feature is shipping for users to enjoy. Cut back to one update a year would mean information technology's a whole 12 months before that feature is rolling out to users. Just, would that exist so bad in the grand scheme of things? Most users really don't care. The only users that do care are Insiders, who can get new builds early anyway.

I actually think that Microsoft needs to focus on improving the reputation of Windows as a Service rather than forcing users to get used to it via frequent updates. Ensure these updates are stable, more so than the current releases, and make people excited about new feature updates again. I really think one major update to Windows ten a year is enough. It's common plenty so that new features show up in a timely mode, but not too common in that it becomes a nuisance.

Information technology also gives Microsoft more than time to make sure a feature update is stable, with every bit little bugs as possible. And that's the most important office.

New report reveals Microsoft's future AR strategy; HoloLens 3 is dead

Oh Honey

New written report reveals Microsoft's time to come AR strategy; HoloLens three is dead

Business Insider has today published a follow-up report with more details about Microsoft's canceled HoloLens 3 augmented reality headset. The partnership with Samsung is said to include a headset with a set of screens inside, powered by a Samsung phone in your pocket.

Review: Surface Laptop SE is the new standard for K-8 Windows PCs

Keeping information technology affordable

Review: Surface Laptop SE is the new standard for K-eight Windows PCs

Starting at just $250, Microsoft's first foray into affordable laptops for the education market is a winner. With a gorgeous pattern, splendid thermals, and a fantastic typing experience, Microsoft would do right to sell this directly to consumers every bit well. Let's merely hope Intel can brand a better CPU.